We have analyzed the data presented yesterday by FHFA to rebut critics that want the GSEs to provide principal forgiveness instead of repayment forbearance. The data in fact do not demonstrate a substantial difference in GSE risk between forgiveness and forbearance, especially if servicers share in the forgiveness. The defining difference for FHFA seems to be that, with forgiveness, others – notably MIs and second-lien holders – also benefit, whereas in forbearance, the GSEs don’t have to share.
The full report is available to subscription clients. To find out how you can sign up for the service, click here