#custody – Federal Financial Analytics

9 03, 2023

DAILY030923

Eliza Allen2023-03-09T16:52:09-05:00March 9th, 2023|2- Daily Briefing|

Barr Emphasizes Steep Barriers to Bank Crypto, Retail CBDC

In remarks today, FRB Vice Chair Barr reiterated that banks should take an extremely cautious approach when engaging with cryptoassets or counterparties and stressed the need to include stablecoins within the regulatory perimeter. For the first time, the Fed made it clear that, while it is open to DLT, smart-contract, and similar payment-system innovations, it is dubious that any will have near-term benefits and all require careful regulatory design.

Expected Battle Lines Form Over CFPB Future

As predicted, today’s HFSC Subcommittee hearing on the CFPB was a partisan and raucous session, with Republicans focusing most strongly on legal and constitutional issues around the Bureau’s funding and enforcement authority and Democrats defending both its legality and effectiveness. Much will come of this in terms of HFSC and floor votes, but we expect no statutory change in this Congress under this President.

Hill Sets Table for Bipartisan Crypto Action

Today’s Digital Assets Subcommittee hearing was considerably more conciliatory than the CFPB session earlier today, with Chairman Hill (R-AR) making clear in his opening statement that he is not launching a partisan attack against the SEC, the banking agencies, or the White House. He hopes instead to press bipartisan legislation, thanking former Chair Waters (D-CA) for her work on stablecoins and emphasizing the need not only for new law there, but also across the array of pending digital-asset questions.

Daily030923.pdf…

6 03, 2023

M030623

Eliza Allen2023-03-06T16:31:40-05:00March 6th, 2023|6- Client Memo|

Why Way-Woke Won’t Work in 2023

The fact that both the House and Senate passed a Congressional Review Act resolution overturning the Department of Labor’s ESG standards makes it clear that striking an anti-woke blow is deemed good politics by red and purple politicians. The President’s certain veto also makes it clear that a blue man sees matters quite differently, as did 204 House Democrats and 46 of their Senate colleagues. This stalemate will continue for changes to federal law, but it won’t stop Republicans from taking a lot out on financial regulators and big banks that they can’t get into the law books. Thus, anyone deemed even a bit woke-ful will get an earful.

M030623.pdf…

6 03, 2023

Karen Petrou: Why Way-Woke Won’t Work in 2023

Arezou Rafikian2023-03-06T16:31:48-05:00March 6th, 2023|The Vault|

The fact that both the House and Senate passed a Congressional Review Act resolution overturning the Department of Labor’s ESG standards makes it clear that striking an anti-woke blow is deemed good politics by red and purple politicians. The President’s certain veto also makes it clear that a blue man sees matters quite differently, as did 204 House Democrats and 46 of their Senate colleagues. This stalemate will continue for changes to federal law, but it won’t stop Republicans from taking a lot out on financial regulators and big banks that they can’t get into the law books. Thus, anyone deemed even a bit woke-ful will get an earful.

Even if all these excoriations are only rhetorical, they will prove meaningful because even federal regulators immune from the appropriations process are susceptible to political influence – as well they should be if they are not also to be unaccountable. That anti-wokeness is already making its mark is evident in many ways, most recently in the inter- agency crypto-liquidity risk statement at great pains to refute any Republican suggestion that tough new standards amount to a blanket ban on engaging in any form of legal cryptoasset activity. In essence, the new statement says, “banks can do crypto if it’s legal, but they almost surely shouldn’t do crypto because it’s way risky and we’re watching.”

To be sure, anything crypto isn’t always toxic. Another way the agencies will handle accusations that they are conducting a stealth-woke anti-crypto campaign is to make it …

3 03, 2023

DAILY030323

Eliza Allen2023-03-03T17:07:43-05:00March 3rd, 2023|2- Daily Briefing|

Senate Dems Demand Bank, Service-Provider Regulation of EWS

Regardless of recent bank changes to Zelle policy, Senate Banking Democrats yesterday sent a letter to the heads of the banking agencies urging them to examine the customer reimbursement and AML practices of banks using Zelle and for the Fed and OCC also to monitor Early Warning Services (EWS).

SEC Custody Bulletin Under Renewed Attack

Senate Banking Member Lummis (R-WY) and HFSC Chairman McHenry (R-NC) late yesterday sent a letter to top banking regulators taking serious issue with an SEC accounting bulletin requiring custodians to recognize digital assets on their balance sheets.

Biden Backs CFPB Late-Fee Proposal

President Biden today reiterated his commitment to targeting “junk fees” in a proclamation announcing this week as National Consumer Protection Week. The statement highlights overdraft fees as unfair and endorses the CFPB’s NPR (see FSM Report CREDITCARD36) cutting credit card late fees to $8.

Daily030323.pdf…

2 03, 2023

DAILY030223

Eliza Allen2023-03-03T17:11:19-05:00March 2nd, 2023|2- Daily Briefing|

Senate GOP Reiterates Anti-Woke Demands

At the same time as the Senate passed a resolution overturning the Labor Department’s rule authorizing pension ESG investments, Sens. Rubio (R-FL), Cruz (R-TX), Cramer (R-ND), Cotton (R-AR), Blackburn (TN), and Scott (R-FL) reintroduced legislation (S. 583) to permit the FDIC to terminate the insured status of depository institutions refusing to provide services to Federal contractors.

HFSC GOP Reams CFPB Late-Fee Proposal

Seventeen HFSC Republicans sent a letter late yesterday to CFPB Director Chopra strongly protesting the Bureau’s recent NPR targeting credit card late fees (see FSM Report CREDITCARD36).

Gensler Boosts SEC Custody Rewrite

SEC Chairman Gensler today reiterated and emphasized his strong support for the agency’s proposal to rewrite the rules governing custody services (see FSM Report CUSTODY5), arguing that they would strengthen safeguards and provide a much-needed expansion to the protections qualified custodians provide.

Bipartisan Senators Target Another Crypto Culprit

Following Sen. Warren’s (D-MA) pledge to introduce bipartisan legislation extending AML protections to crypto firms (see Client Report CRYPTO39), Sens. Warren, Van Hollen (D-MD), and Marshall (R-KS) sent letters yesterday to the leadership of the crypto platform Binance, alleging that the company built an intentionally opaque corporate structure to circumvent securities and AML laws and facilitate money laundering and sanctions evasion.

Brown Demands Branch-Closure Hearings, Merger Policy

In the midst of what may well be negotiations over the nomination of Michael Hsu as Comptroller and continuing controversies over big-bank mergers, Senate Banking Chairman Brown (D-OH) today wrote …

27 02, 2023

Karen Petrou: How the SEC Turned Custody Reform from a Righteous Cause to Jihad and Why it Matters

Arezou Rafikian2023-02-27T09:57:44-05:00February 27th, 2023|The Vault|

As we finalized our new in-depth analysis of the SEC’s rewrite of the nation’s custody rules, I asked some of the best-informed people I know if they had ever heard of a financial custodian. All they could come up with is the name of their elementary-school custodian and, in some ways, this is apt. Custody is among the services often called market “plumbing” because one only notices its importance when something goes wrong or realizes how risky poor maintenance is when everything gets wet. The SEC is right to retool custody services – their abuse was all too evident in the Madoff affair and even more costly to hapless investors in the course of crypto chaos. However, as seems often the case with the Commission, it has taken a righteous cause and turned it into a jihad.

When my question about custody services doesn’t outright kill conversation, I often explain the importance of this obscure financial service as follows: when you give an investment adviser your money to buy stock or other assets, he or she does so on your behalf. The adviser takes a bit – okay, maybe a big bit – for his or her trouble, but the assets purchased are yours, not the adviser’s. If the investment is poor because the asset loses value, that’s your bad. But, if the asset loses value or, worse, disappears due to malfeasance or insolvency on the part of the adviser, you’ve quite literally been robbed. To prevent this, custodial …

27 02, 2023

M022723

Eliza Allen2023-02-27T09:57:34-05:00February 27th, 2023|6- Client Memo|

How the SEC Turned Custody Reform from a Righteous Cause to Jihad and Why it Matters

As we finalized our new in-depth analysis of the SEC’s rewrite of the nation’s custody rules, I asked some of the best-informed people I know if they had ever heard of a financial custodian. All they could come up with is the name of their elementary-school custodian and, in some ways, this is apt. Custody is among the services often called market “plumbing” because one only notices its importance when something goes wrong or realizes how risky poor maintenance is when everything gets wet. The SEC is right to retool custody services – their abuse was all too evident in the Madoff affair and even more costly to hapless investors in the course of crypto chaos. However, as seems often the case with the Commission, it has taken a righteous cause and turned it into a jihad.

m022723.pdf…

24 02, 2023

FedFin on: Custody Reform

Arezou Rafikian2023-02-24T16:53:29-05:00February 24th, 2023|The Vault|

Making full use of powers granted in the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act, the SEC is proposing a wholesale rewrite of the rules dictating how investment advisers must place assets in custody and which institutions are considered qualified for this purpose. Although the proposal was sparked first by controversies surrounding custody for cryptoassets and then by significant investment losses, the NPR reaches most assets held in the direct or indirect possession of investment advisers or to which the adviser may gain possession, also redefining qualified custodians to exclude not only most crypto platforms, but also foreign firms and other entities the Commission believes do not ensure sufficient safeguards protecting investor assets in the event of the adviser’s malfeasance, insolvency, or operational failure….

The full report is available to retainer clients. To find out how you can sign up for the service, click here and here.…

24 02, 2023

CUSTODY5

Eliza Allen2023-02-24T11:15:03-05:00February 24th, 2023|1- Financial Services Management|

Custody Reform

Making full use of powers granted in the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act, the SEC is proposing a wholesale rewrite of the rules dictating how investment advisers must place assets in custody and which institutions are considered qualified for this purpose. Although the proposal was sparked first by controversies surrounding custody for cryptoassets and then by significant investment losses, the NPR reaches most assets held in the direct or indirect possession of investment advisers or to which the adviser may gain possession, also redefining qualified custodians to exclude not only most crypto platforms, but also foreign firms and other entities the Commission believes do not ensure sufficient safeguards protecting investor assets in the event of the adviser’s malfeasance, insolvency, or operational failure. Many of the proposal’s new requirements – e.g., control over beneficial-ownership changes, strict segregation – are already followed by those bank custodians with fiduciary obligations due to their own protocols and regulatory requirements, perhaps giving banks a head-up complying with new standards. However, the new standards may be problematic for at least some custody banks – the SEC wants them to resume fiduciary obligations and does not appear wholly satisfied with bank rules governing qualified custodians.

CUSTODY5.pdf…

17 02, 2023

Al022023

Eliza Allen2023-02-17T12:18:34-05:00February 17th, 2023|3- This Week|

Will Any Crypto Be Left For Congress?

Although media last week seems suddenly to have discovered that banking is getting a divorce from cryptoassets, FedFin noted the inevitability of a parting following our analysis of the Fed’s crypto standards (see FSM Report CRYPTO31), the inter-agency statement reaffirming it, and Basel’s tough stand on crypto-related capital requirements (see FSM Report CRYPTO37). Many in the cryptoverse have demanded that the SEC stop de facto regulation via tough enforcement actions, but they may well think differently when they look at the agency’s new proposal for crypto-related custody. As we noted last week, this proposal has broad implications for custodian banks and the investment advisers who need them, but its stringent new standards could be so toxic to cryptoassets as to reconfigure them into the tokenized versions of fiat-currency obligations to which the banking agencies and the SEC are far more friendly.

Al022023.pdf…