#financial-stability

Home/Tag:#financial-stability
31 08, 2023

DAILY083123

2023-08-31T16:04:01-04:00August 31st, 2023|2- Daily Briefing|

BIS Report: Big Tech in Insurance Poses Financial Stability Risks

The BIS Financial Stability Institute (FSI) released a report today highlighting the financial stability risks associated with big tech’s entry into insurance, noting that a big tech specific regulatory approach may be warranted.  The report finds big tech has a significant footprint in the insurance industry as a service provider but its activities as risk carriers or intermediaries are limited.  Thus, financial stability concerns stem from the concentration of technology services and linkages between financial institutions and commercial activities.

Fed Study: Fintech Partnerships Arbitrage National-Bank Preemption Power

A new study by Federal Reserve staff finds that strategic bank-fintech partnerships heavily and profitably target near- and low-prime consumers in states with restrictive interest rate ceilings.  Thus, fintech partnerships – termed “rent-a-bank” arrangements by critics – in fact arbitrage national-bank preemption powers in states with strict usury ceilings.  This is said to be due in large part to mainstream-bank and non-fintech aversion to higher-risk customers at lower interest rates.

Daily083123.pdf

31 08, 2023

GSE-083123

2023-08-31T09:24:25-04:00August 31st, 2023|4- GSE Activity Report|

The Secondary-Market Suggestion Box

As we noted yesterday, the global banking, securities, and insurance regulators who comprise the Financial Stability Board (FSB) are heading back to look again at securitization to see if the post-08 framework it crafted still works.  The FSB is in our view increasingly irrelevant to home- and host-country rulemaking, but that’s not to say it’s totally toothless.  If – and this is a big if – the FSB comes up with concrete suggestions in key areas such as revisions to regulatory capital or risk-retention standards, U.S. agencies will take a hard look.

GSE-083123.pdf

18 08, 2023

Al082123

2023-08-22T09:52:13-04:00August 18th, 2023|3- This Week|

Capital Regulation Deconstructed

Last week, we provided clients with several more in-depth analyses of the interagency capital proposal.  Of particular note is our wrap-up report (see Client Report CAPITAL234) which looks hard at the agencies’ own quantitative and qualitative impact assessments to see what the raw numbers say, how the numbers comport with current data and market realities, and – most importantly – how to interpret the agencies’ qualitative conclusions in light of these analytics, as well as our understanding of many of the studies on which key assumptions are premised.  As the report details, we agree that the agencies’ rationale for every possible capital woe – that anything is better than a financial crisis – is right.  But it’s only right if the result of the rules is to make financial crises less likely and that, as our reports make clear, is far from assured.  Many provisions of each key section combined with overall quantitative results could well prove profoundly destabilizing.

Al082123.pdf

15 11, 2022

REFORM214

2022-11-22T15:27:38-05:00November 15th, 2022|5- Client Report|

Crypto, Deposit Rates, Capital Top Senate Discussion

At today’s Senate Banking oversight hearing with the banking agencies, Chairman Brown (D-OH) generally applauded the work of regulators, emphasizing the need for tough standards, like-kind rules for bigtech companies, and an inquiry into why depositor interest rates lag Fed rate hikes along lines posed earlier by Sen. Reed (D-RI).  FDIC Acting Chairman Gruenberg concurred, criticizing banks for sluggish rates.  Ranking Member Toomey (R-PA) reiterated his longstanding complaints about regulators straying outside their mission in areas such as climate change.  He also called for SLR relief to reduce Treasury-market risk and opposed pending large-bank resolution guidance (see FSM Report LIVINGWILL19) on grounds that it is unnecessary.

REFORM214.pdf

7 11, 2022

SYSTEMIC94

2022-11-07T12:43:37-05:00November 7th, 2022|5- Client Report|

Fed Systemic-Risk Fears Cloaked in Cautious Financial-Stability Report

As we noted Friday afternoon, the Federal Reserve then released its semi-annual financial-stability report in an effort not only to comply with its protocols, but likely also to attract as little attention as possible, with the release and even the report saying only as much about growing risk as the Fed thinks is essential to preserve its credibility.  In this report, we provide an in-depth assessment not only of the Fed’s latest risk landscape, but also of the steps it recommends be deployed to mitigate it to the extent these are also noted in a largely statistical analysis.  As is often the case, the Fed uses aggregate or average data to assess household financial risk, a methodology we fear obscures distributional effects for the majority of households.  The data – e.g., re non-financial business leverage – are also often as of the end of the report’s data run, not forward-looking.  Where projections are forward-looking – e.g., re non-investment grade or private business leverage – the Fed report generally notes concerns without making clear how acute these may be or the probability that drivers that could significantly and adversely affect them.  Still, as noted earlier today, its discussion of residential-mortgage risk is surprisingly sobering.  The Fed also remains deeply troubled by prime and tax-exempt MMF run risk.

SYSTEMIC94.pdf

7 11, 2022

GSE-110722

2022-11-07T11:11:35-05:00November 7th, 2022|4- GSE Activity Report|

Don’t Scare the Children

In its latest financial-stability report, the Fed is at pains to provide dozens of pages of helpful data with the few systemic-risk conclusions the Board ventures couched in careful prose designed to assure critics that the Fed knows well what’s going on without expressing any views that might suggest serious trouble looms or hint that any of what it surveys will alter the Fed’s course in terms of monetary policy, regulatory actions, or systemic considerations.  Still, its assessment of residential housing is far more pessimistic than its last report, acknowledging for the first time that, as we warned a while back, seemingly robust amounts of borrower home equity can evaporate quickly in a high-priced market flush with high-LTV mortgages.  This is an important early warning sign both for markets and of upcoming actions in areas such as mortgage risk-based capital.

GSE110722.pdf

Go to Top