Karen Petrou: Why Didn’t Supervisors Stop TD Before Trillions Escaped AML Surveillance?

2024-10-15T09:08:17-04:00October 15th, 2024|The Vault|

The enforcement actions last week against TD Bank’s manifold and manifest money-laundering violations bristle with righteous anger.  This is understandable – the bank’s AML lapses are jaw-droppingly dangerous.  But what’s missing from the recounting of TD’s sins is any accountability for why banking-agency supervisors failed to catch violations dating back to 2012 that transgress every compliance, risk-management, and governance norm.  Yes, throw the book at TD, but let’s also call the banking agencies on the carpet for why TD was allowed to grow so big even though it was clearly also so bad.

The enforcement orders from the Fed and OCC are replete with new mandates making it clear that neither agency trusts TD here or back home in Canada to do anything right re AML without two guns at its respective heads.  It falls to FinCEN and the Department of Justice to provide the recounting of what was actually going wrong at TD and how supervisors should have caught enough of them to stop at least some of the trillions of dollars of payments that went without AML scrutiny and enabled billions, if not more, of human and drug trafficking, organized crime, and so much else that victimized all too many people and nations.

Time, not to mention stomach, does not permit listing all of TD’s glaring AML violations starting in 2012 that went uncorrected and indeed materially worsened after a 2013 FinCEN warning.  But even a few examples tell a dismal tale.

For one, TD’s AML compliance team …