Press Center

Press releases and other resources for media.

30 09, 2024

BankThink, American Banker, Monday, September 30, 2024

2024-09-30T11:01:53-04:00September 30th, 2024|Press Clips|

Bank merger policy has long needed a makeover — just not this one

Until this month, the Department of Justice hadn’t finalized the adoption of new bank merger policy guidelines since 1995. Given the banking industry’s rapid evolution during the last three decades, an update was certainly overdue. It unfortunately took the bank failures of 2023 to inspire action on a much-needed bank merger policy makeover, and regulators hastily charged ahead to propose sweeping reforms. Despite soliciting feedback from industry experts and policy analysts that revealed a swath of concerns, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency locked step with the DOJ to finalize their respective rewrites of bank merger criteria largely as proposed. This is not the bank merger makeover we needed. Banking regulators realize that allowing high-risk banks to make still-bigger bets by swallowing other banks can pave a swift path toward a systemic crisis. But, as I emphasized in a study submitted to the regulators, their new policies introduce other threats to the industry’s stability. Bank merger applicants now face heightened uncertainty and delays that are sure to deter the pursuit of sound deals, leaving the door wide open for those making last-gasp efforts to avoid failure.  Scrupulous, modern and aggressive antitrust policy is necessary, but those who govern banks must recognize that midsize bank mergers aren’t monopoly rent-seeking. They are critical if we are to prevent more regional bank failures and stop more

24 09, 2024

Podcast, Banking with Interest, Tuesday, September 24, 2024

2024-09-24T11:24:33-04:00September 24th, 2024|Press Clips|

The Potential “Perverse” Consequences for Banks of New M&A Policies

Host Rob Blackwell

Karen Shaw Petrou, managing partner of Federal Financial Analytics, details how new guidelines by federal regulators to curb M&A could inadvertently increase the market power of the biggest banks and Big Tech.

https://bankingwithinterest.libsyn.com/the-potential-perverse-consequences-for-banks-of-new-ma-policies

16 09, 2024

American Banker, Monday, September 16, 2024

2024-09-17T13:30:44-04:00September 16th, 2024|Press Clips|

Will regulators hit the gas or brakes on remaining post-Basel reforms?

By Kyle Campbell

For more than a year, a once ambitious bank regulatory reform agenda has largely been on hold as agencies deal with the fallout from last summer’s much maligned joint capital proposal. Now that the Federal Reserve, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency are in apparent agreement on a path forward for the so-called Basel III endgame, regulators are poised to work through their backlog of joint initiatives, including expanded long-term debt requirements and new liquidity standards….The Fed, the FDIC and the OCC have been eyeing a long-term debt expansion since 2022, when they issued what is known as an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking — a precursor to a formal rulemaking process — before issuing an official proposal last September. But finalizing that rule while risk-based capital changes are still pending could have significant unintended consequences, said Karen Petrou, managing partner of Federal Financial Analytics. The proposal would set long-term debt requirements at each impacted bank at the greater of 6% of total risk-weighted assets, 3.5% of average total consolidated assets or 2.5% of total leverage exposure if the bank is subject to the supplementary leverage ratio. Because the Basel III endgame proposal would realign the risk-weighting calculus, Petrou said neither banks nor regulators can know the impact of the long-term debt requirement until the capital rules are established. “The long-term debt rule can make no …

8 08, 2024

American Banker, Thursday, August 8, 2024

2024-08-08T09:58:20-04:00August 8th, 2024|Press Clips|

Political bluster threatens the Fed’s ‘vibes-based’ independence

By   Kyle Campbell 

Once taken as a given, the Federal Reserve’s independence is facing existential questions in the current political environment. Former president and Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump said in an interview last week that if elected he would “bring interest rates way down” while also combating inflation, which he said was “destroying our country.”…Others see the agreement as a capitulation by the Treasury to secure short-term participation by the Fed in its war financing efforts. Karen Petrou, founder of Federal Financial Analytics and highly regarded expert on financial policy, said the accord amounted to an acknowledgment by the Treasury that it never had the ability to force the Fed’s hand. “It was essentially Appomattox for the Treasury Department,” Petrou said, referring to the Confederate surrender in the Civil War. “They had to sign it.”

https://www.americanbanker.com/news/political-bluster-threatens-the-feds-vibes-based-independence

 …

5 08, 2024

American Banker, Monday, August 5, 2024

2024-08-05T14:53:36-04:00August 5th, 2024|Press Clips|

‘They need to kick the tires’: Karen Petrou on bank-fintech alliances

By Penny Crosman

The bankruptcy of bank-fintech partnership middleware provider Synapse and the many consent orders banks have received from regulators regarding their fintech relationships have formed a dark cloud over banking as a service. The way forward should include much more due diligence on banks’ part, according to Karen Petrou, co-founder and managing partner of Federal Financial Analytics, a Washington, D.C. firm that provides analytical and advisory services on legislative, regulatory and public-policy issues affecting financial services companies.  “I think they really need to kick the tires and not just look at the fee revenue, but at the resilience of their counterparty in these deals,” Petrou said. “Clearly one of the issues with Synapse is at least a hundred million dollars of customer money is missing, and while [compared to] the scale of trillion dollar financial crises, that might not seem like a lot, it’s a lot to the individual households,” she said in a recent American Banker podcast….

https://www.americanbanker.com/news/they-need-to-kick-the-tires-karen-petrou-on-bank-fintech-alliances

 

 

 …

30 07, 2024

American Banker Podcast, Tuesday, July 30, 2024

2024-07-30T12:04:51-04:00July 30th, 2024|Press Clips|

 Some banks are making a Faustian bargain with fintechs: Karen Petrou
By Penny Crosman

Welcome to the American Banker Podcast. I’m Penny Crosman. The disputes between banking-as-a-service middleware provider Synapse and its banking partners have cast doubt on the whole practice of banking as a service, where fintechs build relationships with customers directly and bank partners keep the money in their vaults. Today we’re here with Karen Petrou, managing partner at Federal Financial Analytics, to get her take on this whole situation and what the way forward might look like. Welcome, Karen.

https://www.americanbanker.com/podcast/some-banks-are-making-a-faustian-bargain-with-fintechs-karen-petrou

5 07, 2024

Marketplace, Friday, July 5, 2024

2024-07-08T11:21:18-04:00July 5th, 2024|Press Clips|

Unpacking the June jobs report

The U.S. economy added 206,000 jobs in June, according to the labor department.   On the other hand, the job growth in previous months was revised down significantly. Let’s discuss with Karen Petrou, co-founder and managing partner at Federal Financial Analytics.

https://www.marketplace.org/shows/marketplace-morning-report/more-signs-of-a-cooling-labor-market/#Unpacking-the-June-jobs-report

25 06, 2024

American Banker, June 25, 2024

2024-06-27T14:51:51-04:00June 25th, 2024|Press Clips, Uncategorized|

Derivatives pose thorny problem for banks, regulators in resolution plans

By Kyle Campbell

Federal regulators want large banks to get specific about their contingency plans for their derivatives holdings. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. and the Federal Reserve cited four of the country’s largest banks last week for weaknesses in their resolution plans related to derivatives — a broad and varied market of financial contracts that include swaps, options and futures. The move was the latest and most direct move by the agencies to encourage banks to step up their practices around the handling of these contracts…Yet because of their complexity and the role they play in financial markets, derivatives receive different legal treatment than other assets on a bank’s balance sheet, said Karen Petrou, managing partner at Federal Financial Analytics. Deemed “qualified financial contracts” by Dodd-Frank, derivatives held by systemically large banks — known as “covered entities” — are shielded from typical default provisions in cases of failure. This means that, unlike in a traditional bankruptcy process, when these banks fail, their counterparties cannot simply close out their derivative positions. This arrangement is meant to protect banks, the FDIC and broader financial stability by mitigating losses for large failed banks and preventing counterparties from having to quickly seek out hedging alternatives.But, because these contracts are treated differently under the special resolution regime than they are under the traditional bankruptcy code, Petrou said there is ambiguity and confusion about how they should be handled.”Without clarification of the bankruptcy …

Go to Top