Arezou

About Arezou Rafikian

This author has not yet filled in any details.
So far Arezou Rafikian has created 2021 blog entries.
19 08, 2024

FedFin on: ILC Charters

2024-08-20T12:26:21-04:00August 19th, 2024|The Vault|

A divided FDIC board has approved a proposal retracting key sections of the agency’s 2020 rule meant to open the way to new ILC charters.  Strongly opposed at the time by now-Chair Gruenberg, the proposal subjects parent companies applying to establish what the NPR calls “captive” or “shell” ILCs to more stringent review when applying for a charter that are likely to lead to denial in most cases.  The NPR also expands the scope of FDIC review when it comes to Change-in-Bank-Control Act (CBCA) notices to charter conversions and certain other actions.  The analysis presented in the proposal along with questions on which it seeks comment suggest the agency could go considerably farther to rein in ILCs, although most additional actions would require new rulemakings.

The full report is available to retainer clients. To find out how you can sign up for the service, click here and here

12 08, 2024

FedFin on: Deposit Composition and Risk

2024-08-12T16:40:54-04:00August 12th, 2024|The Vault|

In conjunction with its proposal to take a far tougher stand on brokered deposits, the FDIC is seeking information on the configuration of U.S. bank deposits that cannot be discerned from current call report data.  If these data persuade the FDIC and other agencies to act, then call-report data could be far more extensive and impose greater market discipline, FDIC premiums could be redesigned, pressure would grow for reliance on core deposits and FHLB advances, and FDIC-coverage reform might gain renewed Congressional attention.

The full report is available to retainer clients. To find out how you can sign up for the service, click here and here.

 …

8 08, 2024

American Banker, Thursday, August 8, 2024

2024-08-08T09:58:20-04:00August 8th, 2024|Press Clips|

Political bluster threatens the Fed’s ‘vibes-based’ independence

By   Kyle Campbell 

Once taken as a given, the Federal Reserve’s independence is facing existential questions in the current political environment. Former president and Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump said in an interview last week that if elected he would “bring interest rates way down” while also combating inflation, which he said was “destroying our country.”…Others see the agreement as a capitulation by the Treasury to secure short-term participation by the Fed in its war financing efforts. Karen Petrou, founder of Federal Financial Analytics and highly regarded expert on financial policy, said the accord amounted to an acknowledgment by the Treasury that it never had the ability to force the Fed’s hand. “It was essentially Appomattox for the Treasury Department,” Petrou said, referring to the Confederate surrender in the Civil War. “They had to sign it.”

https://www.americanbanker.com/news/political-bluster-threatens-the-feds-vibes-based-independence

 …

8 08, 2024

FedFin on: Discount-Window Readiness

2024-08-09T09:14:17-04:00August 8th, 2024|The Vault|

After promising almost since the 2023 crisis to do so, Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA) has introduced legislation designed to force the Federal Reserve’s hand to quickly implement discount-window improvements discussed since it became clear in post-failure analyses that operational challenges accelerated bank failures.  The bill also requires the banking agencies to reflect discount-window capacity in their liquidity standards, a change that would make them less onerous even now and perhaps prove necessary under pending requirements for discount-window preparedness that might involve pre-positioned collateral….

The full report is available to retainer clients. To find out how you can sign up for the service, click here and here.…

7 08, 2024

FedFin on: Changes in Bank Control

2024-08-08T09:51:01-04:00August 7th, 2024|The Vault|

Noting it is committed to developing an inter-agency approach to the issues it addresses in this NPR, the FDIC is seeking to take greater control over holdings in the state non-member banks under its jurisdiction when these come under the Change-in-Bank Control Act (CIBCA), especially when this involves an entity with a passivity exemption from “control” under applicable FRB rules.  The FDIC would not ban large, passive holdings in state non-member banks, but it would likely look askance at at least some, especially when these are in large IDIs that pose the concentration and safety-and-soundness risks identified in this NPR and accompanying questions about still broader …

The full report is available to retainer clients. To find out how you can sign up for the service, click here and here.…

5 08, 2024

FedFin on: Brokered-Deposit Restrictions

2024-08-05T14:55:08-04:00August 5th, 2024|The Vault|

Reversing much in its 2020 brokered-deposit standards, the FDIC is proposing a new regime dictating how banks that are less than well-capitalized facing deposit shortfalls may raise funds from third parties, including even their own affiliates. Even well-capitalized IDIs would face significant strategic challenges because many funds now not considered brokered deposits would need to be recategorized as such, triggering costly requirements in current liquidity and FDIC premium-assessment regulation.  Switching to alternative funding sources is likely to prove more costly and, where IDIs rely on swept funds from affiliates, a challenge to business models premised at least in part on broker-dealer and/or investment-adviser synergies.

The full report is available to retainer clients. To find out how you can sign up for the service, click here and here.

 …

5 08, 2024

American Banker, Monday, August 5, 2024

2024-08-05T14:53:36-04:00August 5th, 2024|Press Clips|

‘They need to kick the tires’: Karen Petrou on bank-fintech alliances

By Penny Crosman

The bankruptcy of bank-fintech partnership middleware provider Synapse and the many consent orders banks have received from regulators regarding their fintech relationships have formed a dark cloud over banking as a service. The way forward should include much more due diligence on banks’ part, according to Karen Petrou, co-founder and managing partner of Federal Financial Analytics, a Washington, D.C. firm that provides analytical and advisory services on legislative, regulatory and public-policy issues affecting financial services companies.  “I think they really need to kick the tires and not just look at the fee revenue, but at the resilience of their counterparty in these deals,” Petrou said. “Clearly one of the issues with Synapse is at least a hundred million dollars of customer money is missing, and while [compared to] the scale of trillion dollar financial crises, that might not seem like a lot, it’s a lot to the individual households,” she said in a recent American Banker podcast….

https://www.americanbanker.com/news/they-need-to-kick-the-tires-karen-petrou-on-bank-fintech-alliances

 

 

 …

30 07, 2024

American Banker Podcast, Tuesday, July 30, 2024

2024-07-30T12:04:51-04:00July 30th, 2024|Press Clips|

 Some banks are making a Faustian bargain with fintechs: Karen Petrou
By Penny Crosman

Welcome to the American Banker Podcast. I’m Penny Crosman. The disputes between banking-as-a-service middleware provider Synapse and its banking partners have cast doubt on the whole practice of banking as a service, where fintechs build relationships with customers directly and bank partners keep the money in their vaults. Today we’re here with Karen Petrou, managing partner at Federal Financial Analytics, to get her take on this whole situation and what the way forward might look like. Welcome, Karen.

https://www.americanbanker.com/podcast/some-banks-are-making-a-faustian-bargain-with-fintechs-karen-petrou

29 07, 2024

FedFin on: Fintech and Other Third-Party Relationships

2024-07-30T10:26:36-04:00July 29th, 2024|The Vault|

In the wake of recent high-profile cases (e.g., Synapse) in which consumers have been put at acute risk, the banking agencies have both reiterated current policy and sought comment on how best to govern relationships that might have an adverse impact on both consumers and affected banks.  Relationships involving deposit products are in the agencies’ immediate sights because they have had the clearest adverse impact when it comes to both fintech and cryptoasset counterparties.  However, the agencies are considering a new framework for bank/fintech relationships that would also affect bigtech and tech-platform companies that have partnered with some of the largest banks to provide payment, credit-card, and other financial services.

The full report is available to retainer clients. To find out how you can sign up for the service, click here and here.

 …

Go to Top