Press Center

Trump, Pulte weaponizing housing finance for political ends, experts say

By Andrea Riquire

“The president has just made us a higher-risk country”

Host David Brancaccio talks with Karen Petrou at Federal Financial Analytics after President Donald Trump moved to fire Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook last evening. That’s Petrou’s conclusion “The president has just made us a higher-risk country”

https://www.marketplace.org/episode/2025/08/26/the-president-has-just-made-us-a-higherrisk-country…

Why the U.S. dollar is under threat as the world’s reserve currency

Host David Brancaccio talks with Federal Financial Analytics’ managing partner, Karen Petrou about US Dollar and Reserve Currency

https://www.marketplace.org/story/2025/08/19/threats-to-the-us-dollar-as-the-the-worlds-reserve-currency

 …

The trouble with Fannie and Freddie

By Sam Sutton

President Donald Trump wants to sell shares in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. And if you believe his Truth Social account, he wants to get a deal done before the end of the year. The structure of a Trump-led initial public offering of the housing-finance giants would be enormously consequential to a $9 trillion market for mortgage-backed securities that helps limit costs for American home buyers. And while an IPO could represent a major step toward ending Fannie and Freddie’s 17-year-old federal conservatorship, pulling it off will force the White House to figure out how to make the companies attractive assets for Wall Street without jeopardizing arrangements that are critical to the mortgage market. “It’s a tricky, tricky balancing act,” said Karen Petrou, the managing partner of Federal Financial Analytics. The administration’s plans for the offering are still hazy, but The WSJ’s initial reporting suggests it would value the two mortgage giants at about $500 billion and involve selling 5 percent to 15 percent of their stock. But if Trump is able to make that happen, it could open the door to future offerings that would simultaneously unwind the government’s ownership stake in the GSEs — which may help deficits — and boost the GSEs’ capital. But whether that results in changes to the MBS market is anyone’s guess. “They’ve got a ways to go,” Petrou said. “But the more stock they sell, the more capital they raise.”..

https://www.politico.com/newsletters/morning-money/2025/08/11/the-trouble-with-fannie-and-freddie-00502602…

US Regulators to Play Key Role in Next Crypto, Bank Fight

By Yash Roy

A major battle between crypto firms and traditional lenders over interest and bank charter applications is poised to be decided by regulators appointed by President Donald Trump, who has been a vocal supporter of digital currencies. …“This is an industry that doesn’t think it needs to wait for rules, unlike the banking industry,” said Karen Shaw Petrou, a managing partner of Federal Financial Analytics, where she analyzes financial firms, including lenders. “Stablecoin issuers just go for it and that’s going to unsettle the banks more than probably anything.”..Recently, Circle announced a partnership with Binance for an off-exchange collateral where customers can park their money when they are not making a payment. The largest US crypto exchange, Coinbase, already offers a rewards program for certain consumers, which some in the banking industry argue could potentially be illegal under the no-interest provisions of the Genius Act. Coinbase disagrees, saying the program has been tailored to be in compliance with the law.“The statutory language is vague and has room for exception, but that’s when the fun starts,” Petrou said.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-08-08/trump-era-regulators-to-play-key-role-in-next-crypto-bank-fight?sref=LTzYu3B0

 …

How Long Can the Fed’s Independence Last?

By Joe Nocera

As the Federal Reserve board was meeting on Tuesday to make its latest decision about interest rates—amid President Donald Trump’s continuing agitation for them to be lowered—I got on the phone with several of Fed chairman Jerome Powell’s most cogent critics. Critics like Karen Petrou, the highly respected cofounder of the bank advisory firm Federal Financial Analytics, who has long argued that the policies of Powell and his predecessors, Janet Yellen and Ben Bernanke, dramatically increased income inequality. Critics like Mohamed El-Erian, the well-known economist, former CEO of bond investing giant Pimco, and now president of Queens’ College, Cambridge, who warned before just about anyone that Powell was sowing the seeds of inflation by keeping interest rates too low early in his tenure. Critics like Christopher Leonard, whose book The Lords of Easy Money makes the case that the huge bond-buying program begun by Bernanke to get the U.S. through the financial crisis—and inexplicably continued by Powell after the crisis was long over—was little more than a gift to Wall Street that did nothing for the rest of us. In other words, they each believe Powell, as Fed chairman, has made multiple mistakes that have cost the United States a great deal. “If he was the CEO of a company, his performance would have gotten him fired,” El-Erian told me. Yet when I asked each of Powell’s critics if Donald Trump should be able to fire him before …

The stablecoin bill is now law. What’s next for banks?

By   Claire Williams

WASHINGTON — Now that President Donald Trump has signed the stablecoin bill into law, banks are gearing up to lobby regulators as they make rules that could either further threaten or protect banks’ traditional turf.
The stablecoin bill poses both an existential threat and opportunity for bankers, experts say….”The issues on which we’re more focused with our banking clients are really the rules that will be forthcoming about how the nonbank issuers can engage on stablecoin,” said Karen Petrou, co-founder of Federal Financial Analytics. “There certainly is the question of the extent to which a bank holding company or an insurance or subsidiary of an IDI could engage in stablecoins. But the bigger issue from most of our clients is what the marketplace is likely to look like and who’s coming at them.” The Fed is also responsible for a key piece. The stablecoin bill says that master account status for nonbank payment stablecoins maintains the status quo, not explicitly banning nonbanks from access.  “Arguably, the Fed has the authority to open master accounts,” Petrou said. “Now, that’s what the stablecoin issuers believe. Banks say no, and the status quo says ‘back over to you, Fed — you decide.”

https://www.americanbanker.com/news/the-stablecoin-bill-is-now-law-whats-next-for-banks

 …

The matter of central bank independence

Who should the head of the Federal Reserve be accountable to? We’ll discuss that and more with Karen Petrou of Federal Financial Analytics.

https://www.marketplace.org/episode/2025/07/22/the-matter-of-central-bank-independence…

Why Banks Are on High Alert About Stablecoins

By Dylan Tokar and Gina Heeb

Stablecoins are poised to become a part of the mainstream financial system, and banks are on high alert about how the cryptocurrency could threaten their business. The House voted 308-122 Thursday to pass a bill that spells out some ground rules for stablecoins, which function as digital dollars in the wider crypto world. The Genius Act is now headed to President Trump, who has indicated he would sign it. A major issue for banks is whether stablecoin issuers will lure away customer deposits. A Treasury Department report in April estimated that stablecoins could lead to as much as $6.6 trillion in deposit outflows, depending in part on whether issuers could offer yields similar to bank accounts….Those concerns would be especially acute if nonbank stablecoin issuers were to get access to the Federal Reserve system, said Karen Petrou, managing partner of consulting firm Federal Financial Analytics, in a recent memo. The Genius Act doesn’t prohibit access to the Fed by nonbank stablecoin issuers, so it will remain up to Fed officials to determine who gets access. The Fed system gives banks access to extra cash in the event of market stress. The trade-off for banks are costly liquidity requirements, which don’t currently apply to stablecoin issuers. Nonbank stablecoin issuers could sap deposits from banks and simply invest them for their own benefit, rather than use them to help fund loans “that benefit banks, borrowers and …