#PC – Federal Financial Analytics

12 07, 2023

DAILY071223

Eliza Allen2023-07-12T17:05:21-04:00July 12th, 2023|2- Daily Briefing|

SEC Concedes, Drops MMF Swing Pricing

In a startling bow to industry comments, the SEC today finalized MMF rules for institutional prime and tax-exempt funds that dispense with the proposal’s swing pricing (see FSM Report MMF19).

HFSC Bickers Over ESG, SEC Authority, Investor Rights

Today’s ESG hearing was the partisan show-down we anticipated – indeed, Rep. Sherman (D-CA) denounced the GOP for “waging war” against capitalism like Leon Trotsky.

Fed Nominations Advance

As anticipated, Senate Banking today approved the nominations of all three Federal Reserve Board nominees for the full Senate.

Warren Heightens Anti-Merger Campaign

Republicans were absent today from Senate Banking’s Economic Policy bank-merger hearing. Chair Warren (D-MA) reiterated her strong opposition to virtually all mergers, indicating her plans to reintroduce anti-merger legislation from prior Congresses (see FSM Report MERGER8).

Daily071223.pdf…

3 07, 2023

DAILY070323

Eliza Allen2023-07-03T16:12:30-04:00July 3rd, 2023|2- Daily Briefing|

UK Targets PE/Private-Credit Interconnections

Although U.S. regulators have begun to talk about inter-connections (see FSM Report SYSTEMIC95), the Bank of England’s top official for international finance today laid out new U.K. policy to address them. Specifically, Nathanaël Benjamin addressed counterparty risk with particular attention to bank private-equity and private-credit exposures. Mr. Benjamin’s concern is principally that, should the U.S. not pull off a soft landing, this sector could experience severe stress that could quickly migrate to asset management.

IOSCO Sticks With SOFR

Acting on concerns often expressed by SEC Chairman Gensler, IOSCO today published its final assessment of USD LIBOR, judging two credit-sensitive alternatives problematic and blessing limited use of certain term SOFRs. The most immediate consequences of this will be to make the Fed still less likely to permit banks to use the limited credit-sensitive exemptions provided in its final alternative-benchmark rule (see FSM Report LIBOR9), with IOSCO emphasizing its point with specific reference to this option by urging only cautious use of these rates and suggesting that regulators (presumably outside the U.S.) review their permissibility.

Daily070323.pdf…

3 07, 2023

M070323

Eliza Allen2023-07-03T12:09:08-04:00July 3rd, 2023|6- Client Memo|

The Unintended Consequence Of Capital Hikes Isn’t Less Credit, It’s More Risk

As was evident throughout Chairman Powell’s most recent appearances before HFSC and Senate Banking, conflict between capital and credit availability characterizes what is to come of the “end-game” capital rules set for imminent release. The trade-off is said to be between safer banks and a sound economy, but this is far too simple. As we’ve seen over and over again as capital rules rise, credit availability stays the same or even increases. What changes is who makes the loans and what happens to borrowers and the broader macro framework, which in the past has been irrevocably altered. The real trade-off is thus between lending from banks and the stable financial intermediation this generally ensures and lending from nonbanks and the risks this raises not just to financial stability, but also to economic equality.

M070323.pdf…

3 07, 2023

Karen Petrou: The Unintended Consequence Of Capital Hikes Isn’t Less Credit, It’s More Risk

Eliza Allen2023-07-03T12:08:54-04:00July 3rd, 2023|The Vault|

As was evident throughout Chairman Powell’s most recent appearances before HFSC and Senate Banking, conflict between capital and credit availability characterizes what is to come of the “end-game” capital rules set for imminent release. The trade-off is said to be between safer banks and a sound economy, but this is far too simple. As we’ve seen over and over again as capital rules rise, credit availability stays the same or even increases. What changes is who makes the loans and what happens to borrowers and the broader macro framework, which in the past has been irrevocably altered. The real trade-off is thus between lending from banks and the stable financial intermediation this generally ensures and lending from nonbanks and the risks this raises not just to financial stability, but also to economic equality.

As post-2008 history makes clear, banks do not stop lending when capital requirements go up; they stop taking certain balance-sheet risks based on how the sum total of often-conflicting risk-based, leverage, and stress-test rules drives their numbers. That all these rules push and pull banks in often-different directions is at long last known to the Fed based on Vice Chair Barr’s call for a “holistic review”. Whether it plans to do anything about them and their adverse impact on the future of regulated financial intermediation remains to be seen. Until something is done, banks will look across the spectrum of capital rules, spot the highest requirement, and then figure out how best to remain profitable …