#ABS – Federal Financial Analytics

17 03, 2023

FedFin Assessment: Future of U.S. Bank Capital, Liquidity, Structural Regulation

Eliza Allen2023-03-17T16:50:38-04:00March 17th, 2023|The Vault|

In this report, we continue our policy postmortem of SVB/SBNY and, now, so much more. Prior reports have assessed the overall political context (see Client Report RESOLVE49) and likely changes to FDIC insurance (see Client Report DEPOSITINSURANCE118), with a forthcoming Petrou op-ed in Barron’s focusing on specific ways to reform federal deposit insurance to protect only the innocent. In this report, we look at some key regulatory changes likely as the banking agencies reevaluate the regional-bank capital, liquidity, and the IDI/BHC construct. As noted in our initial assessment and thereafter, we do not expect meaningful legislative action on the Warren, et. al. bill to repeal “tailoring” requirements, but we do expect bipartisan political pressure not just for supervisory accountability (see another forthcoming report), but also regulatory revisions.

The full report is available to retainer clients. To find out how you can sign up for the service, click here and here.…

17 03, 2023

REFORM216

Eliza Allen2023-03-17T14:27:00-04:00March 17th, 2023|5- Client Report|

FedFin Assessment: Future of U.S. Bank Capital, Liquidity, Structural Regulation

In this report, we continue our policy postmortem of SVB/SBNY and, now, so much more. Prior reports have assessed the overall political context (see Client Report RESOLVE49) and likely changes to FDIC insurance (see Client Report DEPOSITINSURANCE118), with a forthcoming Petrou op-ed in Barron’s focusing on specific ways to reform federal deposit insurance to protect only the innocent. In this report, we look at some key regulatory changes likely as the banking agencies reevaluate the regional-bank capital, liquidity, and the IDI/BHC construct. As noted in our initial assessment and thereafter, we do not expect meaningful legislative action on the Warren, et. al. bill to repeal “tailoring” requirements, but we do expect bipartisan political pressure not just for supervisory accountability (see another forthcoming report), but also regulatory revisions. While Republicans strongly opposed tougher capital rules when Chairman Powell appeared before them just last week (see Client Report FEDERALRESERVE73), we expect them now only to make token statements of concern about any changes that do not adversely affect smaller banking organizations. In addition to looking at specific regulatory rewrites, this report assesses timing, noting in particular how the pending end-game rules could serve as the vehicle for changes the agencies hope to muster quickly in order to minimize demands for structural change to their own powers.

REFORM216.pdf…

25 01, 2023

DAILY012523

Eliza Allen2023-01-25T16:55:15-05:00January 25th, 2023|2- Daily Briefing|

SEC Re-Proposes Rule Targeting ABS Conflicts of Interest

The SEC today voted 5-0 to re-propose a controversial 2011 rule required under the Dodd-Frank Act (see FSM Report ABS17) barring the kinds of conflicts of interest all too evident before the great financial crisis related to asset-backed securitizations (ABS). Although the vote was unanimous, GOP commissioners had significant concerns with the proposal, several of which were shared by Democratic Commissioner Crenshaw. Questions on which the SEC will seek comment or where regulatory changes are possible include the extent to which internal firewalls could be considered sufficient under the law as barriers to conflicts of interest and/or if disclosures to investors are a possible alternative.

FinCEN Targets CRE Sanctions Evasion

Building on its sanctions evasion alert last year, FinCEN today issued an alert detailing red flags that may signal potential sanctions evasion via U.S. CRE investment. Citing the lack of visibility in CRE markets and its large proportion of foreign investors, FinCEN again warns that Russian oligarchs may use shell companies, third-parties, or other proxies to circumvent money laundering and beneficial ownership controls. It also lists the use of an offshore private investment vehicle, ownership of CRE through multiple jurisdictions without a clear business purpose, and failure to disclose beneficial ownership information, among others, as potential red flags that may warrant a suspicious activity report.

Daily012523.pdf…

26 10, 2001