Uncategorized

25 06, 2024

American Banker, June 25, 2024

2024-06-27T14:51:51-04:00June 25th, 2024|Press Clips, Uncategorized|

Derivatives pose thorny problem for banks, regulators in resolution plans

By Kyle Campbell

Federal regulators want large banks to get specific about their contingency plans for their derivatives holdings. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. and the Federal Reserve cited four of the country’s largest banks last week for weaknesses in their resolution plans related to derivatives — a broad and varied market of financial contracts that include swaps, options and futures. The move was the latest and most direct move by the agencies to encourage banks to step up their practices around the handling of these contracts…Yet because of their complexity and the role they play in financial markets, derivatives receive different legal treatment than other assets on a bank’s balance sheet, said Karen Petrou, managing partner at Federal Financial Analytics. Deemed “qualified financial contracts” by Dodd-Frank, derivatives held by systemically large banks — known as “covered entities” — are shielded from typical default provisions in cases of failure. This means that, unlike in a traditional bankruptcy process, when these banks fail, their counterparties cannot simply close out their derivative positions. This arrangement is meant to protect banks, the FDIC and broader financial stability by mitigating losses for large failed banks and preventing counterparties from having to quickly seek out hedging alternatives.But, because these contracts are treated differently under the special resolution regime than they are under the traditional bankruptcy code, Petrou said there is ambiguity and confusion about how they should be handled.”Without clarification of the bankruptcy …

12 07, 2023

American Banker, Wednesday, July 12, 2023

2023-07-13T09:01:26-04:00July 12th, 2023|Press Clips, Uncategorized|

Regulators are aligned on capital reforms. Congress is a different story

By  Kyle Campbell

July 12, 2023Federal regulators have lined up behind stronger capital requirements for large banks, but questions remain about how much political support they can generate in Washington — and how much they will need for their efforts to last.  Unlike the last time bank capital standards were increased after the subprime mortgage crisis, this latest push lacks clear champions in Congress…. Karen Petrou, managing partner of Federal Financial Analytics, said the full impact of the changes will have to be spelled out in the regulators’ notice of proposed rulemaking. In particular, Petrou said the focus will be on differences between the current advanced approaches model used for determining risk-based capital requirements and the new standard approach that will be implemented to align with the so-called Basel III endgame. While capital levels overall will go up as a result of this change, she said, the treatment of specific exposures under the new rules will determine which firms bear the brunt of increase. For banks that have been subjected to the advanced regulations, a switch to a new standard could actually bring a modicum of relief. Because of this, Petrou said she puts little stock in Barr’s assertion that the changes will result in an average increase in capital of 2% across the impacted banks, or that banks could raise the additional equity needed in just two years.”That’s just an average. It’ll have a big impact …

26 05, 2023

American Banker, Friday, May 26, 2023

2023-05-30T11:54:36-04:00May 26th, 2023|Press Clips, Uncategorized|

What’s next for Fed supervision? Basel’s Pillar 2 may hold the key

By Kyle Campbell

Regulatory changes are coming to the Federal Reserve in response to this spring’s three large bank failures, and while some will take years to hash out, others can be implemented much more quickly…Karen Petrou, managing partner of Federal Financial Analytics, said Pillar 2 was created to address safety and soundness concerns that are difficult to control uniformly via top-down, standardized capital or liquidity requirements. It grants supervisors broad jurisdiction over concerns not explicitly addressed in Pillar 1 capital framework — namely credit risk, market risk and operational risk. “When the Basel Committee was figuring out how to handle interest rate risk in the express capital standards, they said supervisors and regulators need to do this themselves, either by express interest rate risk capital requirements suitable for their jurisdiction or supervision,” Petrou said. “Same thing with sovereign risk concentrations and a number of other governance issues. When regulators issue core principles for bank governance, those are Pillar 2 standards.”

https://www.americanbanker.com/news/whats-next-for-fed-supervision-basels-pillar-2-may-hold-the-key

 

 …

15 04, 2022

FedFin: BIS Finds Ways to Give Nonbanks Payment-System Access, Increase CBDC’s Inclusion Impact

2023-03-02T10:53:48-05:00April 15th, 2022|Uncategorized|

As promised, we turn here to an in-depth analysis of a paper from global regulators on whether CBDC contributes to financial inclusion – one of the most vital arguments from those advocating CBDC in the U.S. and in many other nations.  The paper is not analytical, as it is based on interviews with nine central banks exploring retail CBDC, but all of those interviewed view CBDC as an effective tool to promote inclusion if designed to do so and the paper also surveys research to back up its findings.  It details numerous ways CBDC could prove inclusive, including a first-time assessment of how making certain CBDC aspects programmable and how regtech could permit nonbanks to enter the CBDC payment system without undue risk…

The full report is available to subscription clients. To find out how you can sign up for the service, click here.…

15 09, 2021

Mises Institute, Wednesday, September 15, 2021

2021-09-16T17:20:27-04:00September 15th, 2021|Press Clips, Uncategorized|

The Fed Is Bailing Out the Wealthy as Everyone Else Pays the Price
By Ryan McMaken

The Federal reserve says that inequality is a problem. At the same, the Fed also pretends to have nothing to do with it.
Last September, for instance, Jerome Powell bemoaned the “relative stagnation of income” for people with lower incomes in the United States, but then claimed the Fed “doesn’t have the tools” to address this issue. Instead, Powell, being the chairman of this ostensibly “independent” and “nonpolitical” central bank, called for the federal government to engage in fiscal policy efforts at income redistribution….In her new book, Engine of Inequality: The Fed and the Future of Wealth in America, Karen Petrou looks in detail at how Fed policy over the past decade—especially quantitative easing (QE) and ultralow interest rates—have benefited the wealthy while leaving most ordinary people behind. Petrou is one of the more interesting and informative analysts examining the financial services sector. As the head of Federal Financial Analytics Inc., she has provided research on the banking sector for more than thirty years, but in recent years she’s become more focused on exposing and examining the unhealthy and destructive effects of Fed policyPetrou takes a different approach from the Austrians. She appears to have arrived at her conclusions from observing the trends and outcomes produced by Fed policy and then working backward into a theoretical framework. The data seems to have prompted her to ask why things have gone …

8 07, 2021

FedFin on GSIB Transparency

2021-07-08T18:49:49-04:00July 8th, 2021|The Vault, Uncategorized|

The House Financial Services Committee has approved legislation introduced by a progressive Democrat, Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-MA), requiring GSIBs to disclose many quantitative and qualitative matters deemed necessary to assess the extent to which these very large banks engage in behavior that, while legal, treads on concerns related to systemic risk, racial equity, climate risk, incentive compensation, market concentration, and the Community Reinvestment Act.  Many disclosures could bring to light information GSIBs have long considered proprietary that are required of none of their competitors nor of any other public company in the U.S.

The full report is available to retainer clients. To find out how you can sign up for the service, click here

16 04, 2021

Daily042621

2021-04-16T20:42:44-04:00April 16th, 2021|Uncategorized|

Global Crypto Prudential Standards
Moving beyond recent concerns expressed by the Financial Stability Board on “decentralized” finance,1 the Basel Committee is soliciting views on a preliminary assessment of crypto-asset risk and the capital, liquidity, and prudential standards it warrants for banking organizations. Although framed as only a request for general comment, the paper specifies numerous risk-management and supervisory protocols Basel believes should already be in place at banks with direct or indirect crypto exposures. While seeming to differentiate between high-risk exposures and others likely to be considerably less problematic, the overall risk-management framework appears to apply to all crypto exposures.

FedFin Assessment: Expanded U.S. Trade War to Exchange Rates Poses Structural, Strategic, and Systemic Challenges
The Federal Register today includes one of the most controversial steps the Trump Administration is taking in its already contentious trade wars: use of countervailing duties to punish nations the Commerce Department determines are manipulating their currency to advantage export competitiveness.

Daily041621.pdf

27 08, 2020

FEDERALRESERVE43

2020-08-27T21:12:01-04:00August 27th, 2020|Uncategorized|

Powell Defends Senate Bill FBO, Threshold Provisions
In this report, we assess FRB Chairman Powell’s appearance today before the Senate Banking Committee. With the Senate finreg legislation (see Client Report SIFI25) heading to the floor next week, supporters pushed the Chairman to rebut claims that the legislation benefits large foreign banks and eliminates key standards for banks between $100 billion and $250 billion. Despite Treasury Secretary Mnuchin suggesting that FBOs with U.S. operations under $250 billion will benefit from the legislation (see Client Report SIFI26), Mr. Powell said that the FRB will consider these banks’ global total consolidated assets when applying prudential requirements and that the bill does not mandate changes to IHC rules.

FEDERALRESEVE43.pdf

 …

25 08, 2020

SYSTEMIC84

2020-08-25T21:51:57-04:00August 25th, 2020|Uncategorized|

New SIFI Standard Unveiled in AIG Action
Late Monday evening, FSOC released member statements leading to the Friday-night decision to end
AIG’s systemic designation. Most striking among these was Chair Yellen’s regarding the
reason she for the first time sided with Trump appointees against her fellow Obama
hold-overs. As detailed in this report’s analysis of FSOC action, Ms. Yellen did not make a
clear statement in favor of activity-and-practice regulation versus designation even though
global regulators have now generally agreed on the new approach. Instead, she
focused narrowly on AIG’s recent restructuring.

SYSTEMIC84.pdf

Go to Top